Modi's Most Powerful Enemy Is Bureaucracy: Part-2
After the needless EPF controversy, Sutanu Guru revisits and updates a column written and published in September, 2015 about India's rotten "steel frame"
Photo Credit :
Just as cheerleaders were praising finance minister Arun Jaitley and prime minister Narendra Modi for a "good" budget, someone dropped the Employees Provident Fund bomb. It seems the employer's contribution to EPF will be taxed if you want to withdraw any amount before you turn 58. And even after that, the interest component would be subject to taxes if you choose to withdraw your savings rather than opt for an annuity. This has triggered a storm of protests even amongst BJP supporters. Clarifications issued by the finance ministry have added to the confusion and the controversy.
This prompted me to go back a bit in time and read what I had written on September, 17, 2015 which happened to be the birthday of prime minister Modi. The headline of the analysis I wrote was: Modi's Most Powerful Enemy: Bureaucracy. Many events since then have provided further proof that this hypothesis is not off the mark. In the paras below, the updates are in italics.
Today happens to be Ganesh Chaturthi. It also happens to be the birthday of the Prime Minister Narendra Modi. If you believe gossip, many bureaucrats today are praying to Lord Ganesh and seeking a single term for the Prime Minister. Last evening, the NDA regime dropped a bombshell on bureaucrats. It has decided that bureaucrats who are either incompetent or tainted, or both, will face compulsory retirement after they celebrate their 50th birthday. Like in many senior positions in the private sector, they will get three months to pack their bags.
If this decision is actually implemented, it would be a monumental achievement. Indian bureaucrats might think that they constitute the steel frame that holds the country together. But the average citizen loathes and detests Indian bureaucrats. For the aam aadmi, the bureaucrat is inaccessible, arrogant, unaccountable and often corrupt to the core. This is not a sweeping generalization or judgement. Many individual bureaucrats are indeed inspirational role models. But as a group, they have behaved like parasites who have done everything possible to prevent the innate entrepreneurial energies of India from blossoming. Sure politicians too have done that. But many of them get kicked out by voters every five years or so. Not so with Indian bureaucrats.
Six months after the Modi regime announced that it would pack off incompetent bureaucrats, there are no signs of any plan to do so. If the government really wanted to at least "communicate" that it meant business, at least some examples could have been publicly set. No such luck for India. That's the vice like grip the bureaucracy exercises even over powerful politicians with clear mandates!
Let me give you two examples of the mischief (I don't know if deliberate or not) that bureaucracy is capable of; and how that can inflict irreparable damage. Finance Minister Arun Jaitley keeps repeating ad nauseam that his government is committed to simplifying tax rules and procedures for individuals as well as companies. Last year, when he was out of India, the "babus" released a new income tax form that horrified even die hard supporters of Modi. This marvel of a form required taxpayers to detail all expenses incurred in foreign trips apart from many other infuriating requirements. Jaitley was forced to "order" his babus to withdraw that "order". But his reputation as a reformer was virtually shattered.
Look at what happened recently. A massive and ambitious Make in India week was organized in Mumbai with the prime minister and the finance minister once again offering India as the best destination for global investors. Many multinationals did commit investments to set up actual manufacturing facilities. But then Vodafone got yet another "routine" notice from tax authorities that its assets could be seized if it did not cough up retrospective tax worth billions of dollars. All the positivity generated by the Make in India week was destroyed at one stroke. Look at the EPF row now. Some babu has decreed that you are "rich" if you earn more than Rs 15,000 a month! Is there a better way to alienate supporters and voters?
The second example relates to the sensitive and controversial issue of One Rank, One Pension (OROP). The Prime Minister had made a solemn commitment to implement it during his election campaign. But thanks to bureaucrats, the decision kept getting delayed. Matters reached a stage where armed forces veterans started losing faith and trust in Modi. Even when the decision was announced formally by the Defense Minister Manohar Parrikar, the babus managed to create confusion and rift. The official statement had the words "voluntary retirement". Instead of celebrating the implementation of OROP, veterans were wondering what this meant. It took a public clarification from Modi to clear the air. But the damage had been done by then.
The OROP package should have been a political triumph for prime minister Modi. After all, no politician had taken the kind of personal interest in redressing this injustice ever since Indira Gandhi had virtually abolished OROP I. The 1970s. And yet, people who had information about the last stages of negotiations say that the "babus" we're so cussed and so petty that all the potential goodwill simply evaporated. And as you will see soon, the "babus" had their revenge through the Seventh Pay Commission.
It is not as if no efforts have been made to reform Indian bureaucracy and governance. An Administrative Reforms Commission was first set up in 1966 to suggest reforms. It submitted about 20 reports before being wound up in the 1970s. No recommendation made about bureaucrats being made accountable and more responsive to citizens was implemented. The second such Commission was formed in 2005 and has submitted about 15 reports. Any implementation of accountability? Sorry. Three successive Pay Commissions since the 1980s have strongly recommended basic steps like performance based increments and promotions for bureaucrats. Nothing doing.
The problem is that the bureaucracy, like an army of termites, has so deeply infiltrated every institution and organization of governance that they have become de facto lords and masters. The telecom regulator is usually a retired IAS officer. The Chief Information Commissioner is usually a retired IAS officer; someone who has perhaps spent his entire career thwarting transparency! The Competition Commission of India is headed by an IAS officer. The Election Commission is inhabited by retired IAS officers. The administrative tribunals are headed by retired IAS officers. The aviation regulator is invariably a retired IAS officer. The UPSC chairman is usually a retired IAS….The list is endless. People in the know joke that it is a divine blessing that the Delhi Metro was headed by a technocrat like E. Sreedharan. If an IAS had headed it, the damn thing might still be under construction!
Very soon, the recommendations of the Seventh Pay Commission (inhabited mostly by retired bureaucrats) will be submitted. There will be strong recommendations about variable pay, transparent performance appraisals and increments and promotions linked to performance. Perhaps Modi might gather the political will to finally bite the bullet and implement reforms in bureaucracy. The decision to compulsorily retire some after the age of 50 looks like a promising first step. But make no mistake: the Empire will strike back; and viciously. More than political opponents, it is this entrenched mafia that will make every attempt to derail his governance agenda.
The Seventh Pay Commission recommendations have been accepted and implemented. They give a 23% hike to all government officials. But there is absolutely nothing to suggest that babus will be held accountable for their performance. Like many feared last year, it is business as usual. And of course, bureaucrats have sneaked in preposterous "packages". A bureaucrat serving in Guwahati is entitled to more than double "hardship allowance" than an army officer battling terrorists in the Kashmir valley. The most petty revenge extracted by the babus was a new policy whereby family members of armed forces officers who would not (actually cannot) stay with the officer in his or her place of posting would now be denied the "free ration" they were entitled to. How petty can one get?
Almost halfway through his term, Modi seems to have realized that his cabinet lacks talent, depth and gravitas. But when will he realize that it is the bureaucracy that is derailing his dreams?